What I Say In The Video:
Andrew Goodwin published a book
called “Dancing in the Distraction Factory” in 1993 in which he discussed why
he believed that music videos should not follow a narrative style. He didn’t
necessarily agree with the ideas that Todorov had. Todorov’s ideas followed a
story like sequence; almost like a beginning, middle and end. It starts with an
equilibrium where there is a balance between good and evil in the universe.
There is then a disruption where a negative event takes place. There is then
recognition of this disruption and the protagonist is usually the one that
notices it. There is an attempt to repair the disruption caused by the
antagonist. Finally, equilibrium is reached and balance is restored.
However, it doesn’t mean that music videos are very “avant garde” it
just means that they are easier to steer away from the narrative style. The
choruses are parts of the song that are repeated and this means that various
scenes can be repeated in music videos.
Illustration
is where the video narrates the lyrics to the song, amplification is where the
video introduces new meanings to a video but doesn’t contradict the lyrics and
disjuncture is where there is little connection between the video and the
lyrics.
Carol
Vernallis’ theory was more focused on the editing of a music video. She
summarised her theory with four main concepts. She believed in amplification
where the lyrics are brought to life on screen but the video may be fragmented
and pose questions that may not be answered. She believed that editing should
match the beat of the song but may break some rules e.g the 180 degree rule.
When it comes to camera movement and framing, she raises the idea that every
music video that accompanies a specific genre of music has its own shot types
for example many pop videos use wide shots to capture the dancers. She also
mentioned diegesis “the world within the music video” which may involve
repeating the same shots at different angles so that the audience has a good
sense of the world within the music video.
Our
video went against the ideas of both Goodwin and Todorov. I think our video
followed Vernallis’ theory the best. Our video didn’t follow a classic
narrative structure but it also wasn’t very “avant garde”. Our video showed amplification
where new meanings were given to the lyrics but we didn’t steer too far away
from the lyrics either. Our editing also matched the beat of the song with
quick pace changes as the choruses tended to be more upbeat which Vernallis
mentioned.
We decided to create our music video this way
because we wanted to make it appealing to our core audience (18-24 year old
females). We researched other music videos from the same genre and none of them
showed disjuncture, although many did show illustration. Therefore, this is
clearly what the core audience were most drawn to so we followed the same
conventions.
This video influenced some of our shot types (camera-work) and actual content for our music. We decided to draw inspiration from the scene of the artist in an empty bath. In Taylor Swift’s video, it snows inside her house. This was an idea that we liked but knew was not possible to do ourselves successfully. We decided to place our artist in a bath because it shows loneliness visually; the artist alone in a cold bath.
Bloom influenced our shot types as well as locations. The
song itself in the folk genre and shows similarities with our song as you can
clearly hear the guitar in both songs. Many of our shots are very similar to
the ones of this video but the concept is different. The locations however,
show similarities. Both videos are located in a very green, outdoor location.
this
video influenced our editing style. In this video, shots of the artist alone
cut between shots of her and her lover together which creates a flash back
effect. We decided to adapt the same editing technique, however, we also
changed the colour of some of the footage to make it black and white; this made
it even clearer that these scenes were flashbacks. Also, our flashbacks were
concentrated in the chorus parts of the song whereas Gabrielle Aplin has them
spread throughout the video; not specific to either verses or choruses.
We were influenced by the choice of costume from all videos.
All costume was loose fitting and muted in colour. Two of these videos also had
guitars in them which influenced our choice of synergy props.
How conventional is my website and digipak?
I managed to link my digipak and website by using the same background and images for both.
Conventions challenged:
My digipak design looks “busy” the background I created
incorporated lots of images that linked well together to create one effective
background (the pictures were also faded and decreased in opacity to make sure
it wasn’t overpowering and didn’t take the focus away from the artist). Most
digipaks of other folk artists are kept very simple, with one coloured or
patterned backgrounds and minimal design, costume and writing. Basics of
digipak design are used.
No comments:
Post a Comment